Halloween: A Robber’s Favorite Festival or No?

Category : Crime, Current Events, Humor

Criminals, in particular vandals and robbers, often disguise their appearance for purposes of shielding their identity. While it is difficult for a bank robber to wear a ski mask in plain sight without garnering some suspicion (unless of course its January in Minnesota), criminals have been known to take advantage of seasonal festivities to avoid a mugshot. For example, there have been many accounts of serial Santa Claus and Easter Bunny robbers during Christmas and Easter events in the past. But perhaps the most opportune time for these ill-intentioned individuals to don a mask and do their evil deeds would be Halloween.  Halloween night is full of masked and costumed individuals precariously walking the streets. A robber can easily disguise himself and blend in as one partaking in the festivities, thereby significantly reducing the chance of being fingered by a witness and/or getting apprehended by police. Because of the heightened danger of theft or robbery, law enforcement agencies urge gas stations and convenience stores to post visible signs that require all customers to remove masks before entering.  People are advised to travel in groups and avoid less trafficked areas. While the police are doing its part to protect the public, allow me to share a piece of advice to any of you thinking of being naughty this Halloween.

There is a particular mask being sold online that has been quite the hot item this season. The “Casey Anthony” headpiece is made of latex and rubber and bears a remarkable resemblance to the infamous woman believed by many to have drowned and duct taped her own daughter. Whatever your opinion of this woman may be, if your intention is to just scare someone, the mask will definitely do the trick. Depending on your taste though, it may or may not be deserving of a treat.

But if it’s a little more than a trick or treat you are seeking, you might want to think twice about wearing the freakish headpiece. The controversy over this lady’s guilt or innocence has created such a severe level of animosity towards this human being not seen since the OJ Simpson trial. So unless Mr. Robber you want to become the victim and look like Ms. Anthony below, stick to the Michael Myers mask, LOL.

 

 

 

 

This article is intended for entertainment purposes only.

‘Biker’ Club Starbucks

Category : Current Events, Houston, Humor

To those of you native to Houston, you are quite familiar with the 24 hour Starbucks in the Galleria area appropriately named “Club Starbucks.” The Westheimer and Post Oak location is one of the highest grossing stores for the coffee franchise in the country. The bustling crowd remains strong well through the wee hours of the night on any given weekend. If you frequent the location at night, you can’t help but notice the biker clubs that occupy the majority of the parking spaces out front. One night may feature a number of Harley Davidsons while another night may spotlight a number of Yamahas and Kawasakis. It’s really a trip because the owners of these fine pieces of machinery are hanging out of all places at a STARBUCKS. You’d think these bad mamajammas would be showing off their bad to the bone swagger at a local bar, but nooooo, it seems Starbucks is the new post-up shop for these ‘gangstas’ as evident in a fairly recent California incident.

A few days ago, the worst California Biker feud in a decade erupted in a turf war that started over…you guessed it – Starbucks! Several men were killed and/or wounded  at a casino in a scuffle between the notorious Hell’s Angels and their rival Vagos motorcycle club. One of the casualties included the Hells’ Angels president of the California Chapter Jeffrey “Jethro” Pettigrew.

While biker brawls are nothing new, what’s interesting about this one is the source of the conflict. An investigation revealed that the gangs’ rivalry was renewed in January of 2010 over some enviable real estate – Starbucks! The Hell’s Angels were posted up at a Santa Cruz Starbucks, acting cool and collected, when members of the Vagos club came wielding ball-peen hammers. And why? According to Santa Cruz Deputy Police Chief Steve Clark, ”It was all about who would be allowed to hang out at the Starbucks downtown. The Vagos brazenly came in and tried to cement their presence. It was a pretty strong play on their part to establish themselves as the premiere club.”

He added: “Only in Santa Cruz would you have biker wars over who’s going to control pumpkin spice lattes.”

Correction, part two maybe coming to a Houston Starbucks near you…and this time for the seasonal classic peppermint mocha!

Godfather IV: The Euro Saga

Category : Finance

Chancellor Angela Merkel and President Nicholas Sarkozy did their best impression of Vito Corleone in their rendition of the Godfather today. The leaders of Germany and France respectively were able to broker a deal to save Greece from falling into bankruptcy by basically passing on a big chunk of the country’s debt to private banks holding Greek bonds.

For those of you who don’t quite understand what is happening in Europe, let me try my best at simplifying this mess. Think of Greece as a company whose operating costs are much greater than their sales (Greece’s debt was 160% of its Gross Domestic Product). So what does a company do to stay in business while it loses money “temporarily?” Borrow! Greece did just that by selling tons of bonds to banks, but it got to the point where banks stop lending. Unfortunately, Greece was still in a pickle and had no one to lean on…so it turned to its family members. In this case, that family is the Eurozone, which is an economic union of 17 European countries. Now this family, just like any family, has a momma and poppa who provide for the little ones. The Momma and Poppa of the Eurozone is Germany and France. Now these responsible parents set up a savings account called the EFSF (European Financial Stability Facility) in case any member of the family was in a bind and desperate for cash. Now while each family member was supposed to chip in to this big piggy bank, Momma and Poppa did most of the work by guaranteeing nearly 50% of the One Trillion Euro fund (about 1.4 billion dollars). But because of the losses sustained during the global recession, only 250 billion was left. So when little ole Greece came asking for more than half of what was left to pay off the banks it owed, what did good ole Momma and Poppa do? True to mobster form, Merkel and Sarkozy paid a visit to those creditors.

Picture an old Italian restaurant in the backstreets of Sicily. The restaurant is dimly lit, tables are spaced too close to each other, and there’s not a single patron in sight. In the far corner table is a man well dressed, hair parted to the side, wearing black-rimmed glasses. His briefcase is laid out on the black and white checkered tablecloth with a bunch of documents littered in fine print too small for the eye to see. In walks a chubby middle-aged woman and a skinny gray-haired man with an evil grin cheek to cheek. They walk up to the corner table and have what is normally called a “sit-down” in this part of town. After exchanging a few pleasantries, Momma picks up the documents in front of the well-dressed man and tears it to pieces. The well-dressed man immediately becomes hostile, but Poppa simply points his finger and the man is staring down the barrel of a 357 magnum being held by none other than the waiter. Momma pulls out a single sheet of paper from her coat pocket and says “sign it or else!” And just like that Greece wiped out $100 billion Euros off its debt.

While it is a bit dramatized, this Italian restaurant scene is basically what happened in some conference room today in Europe. Leaders from Germany and France met with these private banks that were owed hundreds of billions of Euros by Greece and somehow “voluntarily” accepted a 50% cut in its bond investments to reduce Greece’s debt by 100 billion Euros. They “voluntarily” gave up 100 billion Euros? Who are these guys kidding? Can you imagine what was really said in that boardroom? My guess was “take a 50% loss or 100% loss, which is it?” {With Germany and France’s tanks behind them and Blackhawk helicopters hovering above, lol).

Now what about the rest of the money owed? You think Germany and France are going to use that piggy bank? HELL NO! Just like a famous mobster once said, “never use your own money to start a business,” Momma and Poppa followed suit. Instead of dipping in to what’s left of the EFSF, Momma and Poppa created some perks and incentives to anyone daring enough to invest and repair the Eurozone’s debt crisis. Essentially, they are hoping China will take the bait and throw money at them and odds are they’re right.

And Momma and Poppa will be back sitting in the corner table of that old Sicilian restaurant puffing on big fat cigars toasting to a “hard” day’s work.

Prisoner Swap: Beginning of Diplomatic Relations?

Category : Current Events, World News

In a groundbreaking move last week, Israel carried out a prisoner swap agreement previously negotiated with Hamas, the political party that governs the Palestinian Territory’s Gaza Strip. The controversial deal required Israel to release more than a thousand Palestinian prisoners in exchange for an Israeli soldier held captive since 2006. What’s shocking about the compromise is that Hamas is officially labeled by Israel as a “foreign terrorist organization.” While Hamas legitimately won a decisive majority in the 2006 Palestinian Parliamentary elections, Israel refused to recognize Hamas as the official governing authority in the Gaza Strip. So it begs the question: since when did Israel start to negotiate with terrorists? We may very well find that answer by analyzing the history of Israeli-Palestinian diplomacy.

The one authority Israel does recognize in the Palestinian territories is the Fatah political party, which was and still is the largest faction of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (also known as the “PLO”). For decades, more than 100 nations have identified the PLO as the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people. However, it wasn’t until the 1991 Madrid conference that Israel and the United States recognized the PLO as the official governing authority in Palestine. Before then, the US and Israel regarded the PLO as a terrorist organization and were firm in its’ stance that the PLO could not be a party to peace negotiations. That all changed when the PLO recognized Israel’s right to exist in peace and accepted the UN Security Council resolutions 242 and 338, which rejected violence and terrorism. As a result, Israel officially recognized the PLO as the representative of the Palestinian people and immediately began diplomatic relations.

However, no such change in political viewpoint has occurred with Hamas. Hamas has declared Israel its sworn enemy and refuses to acknowledge any peace plan that recognizes Israel’s right to exist. So if Israel refused to hold talks with the PLO back in the 1980s, why didn’t it hold true to its historical stance this time around with Hamas? This is a difficult question, but it seems that when the people cry loud enough, the politicians begin to listen. In a February 2008 Haaretz (Israel’s oldest newspaper) poll, nearly two-thirds of Israelis favored holding direct talks with Hamas about a cease-fire and the potential release of captives. This public opinion was further reinvigorated in a late 2009 poll conducted by the same newspaper, which held that the majority of Israeli citizens supported some form of dialogue with Hamas. Interestingly, the same public sentiment rumblings occurred shortly after the 1988 Palestinian uprising termed the Intifada. While Israeli government officials refused to sit down with PLO officials, the majority of Israeli citizens supported the move in an attempt to arrive at a non-violent resolution to the ongoing and recurring conflict. Ultimately, the government conceded albeit behind its smoke and mirrors ploy requiring acceptance of certain UN resolutions.

It would seem that Israel is now repeating what it soon realized with the PLO in the early 1990s, that without a legitimate representative partner recognized by the people, there can be no real foundation for peace. That party is not Fatah, at least not alone. In reality, how could it be? Hamas enjoys the overwhelming majority of the Palestinian Parliament. What sense does it make to negotiate the terms of a peace deal with a political party that was not put into power by its own countrymen? In fact, the Fatah party themselves recognized their own futility earlier this year by agreeing with Hamas to dissolve all political organizations and unite to form one government in 2012.

It seems that today’s events is a sign that Israel has come to grips with the fact that it must deal with Hamas to have any real shot at peace. Here’s hoping that Israel’s willingness to compromise will lead to a renewed hope for peace in a land desperate for some good news.

For a video account detailing the swap, click here Prisoner Swap